How much time should EAs spend engaging with other EAs vs with people outside of EA?

post by MichaelA · 2021-01-18T03:20:47.526Z · EA · GW · No comments

This is a question post.

Contents

  Answers
    MichaelA
    MichaelA
    MichaelA
None
No comments

Obviously the answer to this will vary for different people, and obviously each individual EA should spend at least some time engaging with members of both of those very broad categories of people. But it still seems useful to ask questions like:

  1. In general, how much time should EAs spend engaging with other EAs vs with non-EAs?
  2. How does the amount of time EAs should spend engaging with other EAs vs with non-EAs differ based on various conditions?
    • E.g., whether we're asking what a more vs less engaged EA should do, whether we're asking what a budding researcher vs budding policymaker should do, and whether this engagement in intended for social purposes vs gaining knowledge vs forming connections
  3. What are the main factors driving answers to those questions?

I've seen various interesting discussions of these sorts of questions, and thought it'd be useful to have one post which collects together (a) a bunch of links to prior statements on this and (b) new statements on this. So please answer with either links, your own views, or both. (I'll provide some links and views in an answer myself.)

Meta comments which you can skip:

Answers

answer by MichaelA · 2021-01-18T03:55:56.807Z · EA(p) · GW(p)

Some factors that could influence answers to this cluster of questions:

(This is just a very quick, non-exhaustive list, with very little commentary. I'm hoping other people can add a bunch more factors, commentary, etc.)

  • Concerns about value drift
  • The value of bringing people who are currently outside of EA into the EA movement
  • The value of introducing people who are (and might remain) outside of EA to EA ideas
  • The value of getting a diversity of views
  • How much a person should be focused on working at EA vs non-EA orgs
    • There are various ways this could be relevant
      • One is that, if one is more focused on working at non-EA orgs, that might increase the value of building strong networks in specific communities outside of EA (e.g., in specific policy or academic communities).
  • Specific things to do with personal preferences and circumstances
comment by remmelt · 2021-02-19T14:10:39.192Z · EA(p) · GW(p)

Thank you for starting a  thread on this open question! Just reading through.

I wrote some quick thoughts on the value of getting a diversity of views here [EA · GW].

answer by MichaelA · 2021-01-18T03:42:23.998Z · EA(p) · GW(p)

Some prior statements/discussion of this cluster of questions:

(I'm sure there are many other relevant links that have slipped my mind or that I never saw, which is why this is a question post rather than just a post!)

answer by MichaelA · 2021-01-18T03:49:37.652Z · EA(p) · GW(p)

Some related questions:

How much should EAs focus on working at EA orgs vs at other orgs? 

  • And how does this vary based on various aspects of the individual/situation in question? And what are the factors driving answers to these questions?
  • We could also ask about working in roles explicitly in vs not explicitly in the EA community, if we wanted to also capture independent work, founding new orgs, etc.
  • Prior discussion:
    • There's a lot, and I haven't taken the time to compile it here
    • One recent discussion occurred in this post and some of the comments on it: My mistakes on the path to impact [? · GW]

How much time should EAs spend consuming content (e.g., papers, articles, podcasts) created by EAs vs content not created by EAs?

  • I assume this has been discussed before in various places, though I can't immediately recall where

(Presumably many other questions could also be mentioned.)

No comments

Comments sorted by top scores.