How do you decide between upvoting and strong upvoting?

post by anonymous_ea · 2019-08-25T18:19:11.107Z · EA · GW · 2 comments

This is a question post.

Contents

  Answers
    Halffull
    Emanuele_Ascani
    FlorentBerthet
    alexherwix
    Thomas Kwa
None
2 comments

I'm curious to hear other people's thoughts and habits on this!

Answers

answer by Halffull · 2019-08-27T19:28:25.784Z · EA(p) · GW(p)

I upvote if I think the post is contributing to the current conversation, and strong upvote if I think the post will contribute to future and ongoing conversations (IE, its' a comment or post that people should see when browsing the site, aka Stock vs. Flow [LW · GW]).

Occasionally, I'll strong upvote/downvote strategically to get a comment more in line with what I think it "deserves", trying to correct a perceived bias of other votes.



answer by Emanuele_Ascani · 2019-08-27T11:17:53.801Z · EA(p) · GW(p)

I think I upvote mostly like this (I'll edit this answer if I remember more reasons):

Strong upvote: correct (if applicable) and important.

Upvote: correct (if applicable) and slightly important, or not completely correct but interesting/potentially important (In this case I usually also reply). I also tend to upvote comments under my own posts much more because I feel the need to thank the person who took the time to write the comment somehow.

I don't always follow these rules exactly, but mostly. For example, sometimes I upvote to close the gap between two comments I consider equally important under a post.


answer by FlorentBerthet · 2019-08-26T15:37:35.569Z · EA(p) · GW(p)

I vote based on how much I think something contributes to the discussion, aiming for a roughly equal split between upvotes and strong-upvotes (which I expect to be somewhat of a Schelling point). Same logic for downvotes vs strong-downvotes, though I obviously don't split 50/50 between upvotes and downvotes.

answer by alexherwix · 2019-08-26T14:46:16.664Z · EA(p) · GW(p)

I generally upvote if I find myself agreeing with a well-made point or unusually surprised because I haven't thought about it this way before and I find it informative.

I strong-upvote if I feel strongly about my reason to upvote in the first place or if I want to support an opinion/person strategically.

Thus, I see voting pretty pragmatically. Moreover, I don't really think it is that important as my (strong) vote doesn't really carry that much weight at the moment.

comment by JP Addison (jpaddison) · 2019-08-27T13:40:12.913Z · EA(p) · GW(p)

I agree with this, but I add a factor for well-written-ness and the cleverness of the idea.

answer by Thomas Kwa · 2020-09-25T02:35:30.684Z · EA(p) · GW(p)

Karma should be awarded when a post or comment is high-quality, especially when it's hard for others to notice the high quality. So I strong-upvote a comment when it has an important non-obvious insight and I needed to think for a while before understanding it.

2 comments

Comments sorted by top scores.

comment by lucy.ea8 · 2019-08-25T18:30:18.951Z · EA(p) · GW(p)

Related: how do people decide to downvote? My comments consistently get downvoted. Would love to know why.

comment by michaelchen · 2019-08-25T21:33:43.687Z · EA(p) · GW(p)

There was a question a while ago on motivations behind downvoting: https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/KZkDBm6vuPMFALjQx/why-do-you-downvote-ea-forum-posts-and-comments [EA · GW]