"Reversing problems" vs "Slowing down problems"

post by freedomandutility · 2021-07-16T21:07:27.492Z · EA · GW · No comments

This is a question post.

Contents

  A couple of examples:
  Climate change
  Ageing
None
No comments

I think there might be a variety of problems where the solutions can be divided into A) solutions that works by slowing down the problem and B) solutions that work by reversing the problem.

I think allocating resources to solutions that work by reversing problems will usually have greater expected value than allocating resources to solutions that slow problems down, and that this might be a useful heuristic, especially when we're dealing with a lot of unknowns and expected value is very difficult to compare.

 

A couple of examples:

Climate change

A) reducing meat consumption - could only slow down future increases in greenhouse gas concentration

B) carbon capture technology - could potentially reduce atmospheric greenhouse gas concentration below its current level

Ageing

A) slowing down biological processes that produce the effects of ageing - could only slow down ageing

B) reversing damage caused by ageing - could potentially decrease biological age

 

I assume that there are situations where "the same solution" could start off slowing down a problem, and then with enough improvement / investment it could eventually start reversing the problem, but I couldn't think of an example.

Answers

No comments

Comments sorted by top scores.