Announcing Effective Altruism Grants

post by MaxDalton (Maxdalton) · 2017-06-09T10:28:15.441Z · EA · GW · Legacy · 16 comments

Contents

  Motivation and aims
  What projects could get funded?
  How the grants work
  Evaluation criteria
  Application process
None
16 comments

I'm announcing a new project from the Centre for Effective Altruism: Effective Altruism Grants [? · GW]. Effective Altruism Grants aims to provide grants of up to £100,000 (~$130,000) to help individuals work on promising projects.

We hope to fund a wide range of effective projects that will directly or indirectly contribute to making the world a better place. We primarily expect to fund individuals who explicitly endorse the principles of effective altruism, broadly construed, but are in principle open to funding projects of any form.

This project is being run by the Centre for Effective Altruism. Individual applicants may receive up to £100,000 (~$130,000). CEA will cap our total funding for the Effective Altruism Grants in 2017 at £500,000 (~$650,000), but will present promising applications that we have not chosen to fund to other significant donors. These include the Effective Altruism Community Fund. This means that the total pool of available funding may be significantly higher.

We are running this project as a way to support the effective altruism community and to allow people to pursue useful projects. The Centre for Effective Altruism will only fund projects that further its charitable objects.[1]  However, we also welcome applications that may be of interest to our partners who are also looking to fund promising projects.

Motivation and aims

Effective altruism has attracted many people of outstanding talent and motivation. We believe that providing those people with the resources that they need to realize their potential could be a highly effective use of resources.

Currently, this funding opportunity is relatively neglected within the effective altruism community. There are not many donors directly funding small projects run by individuals. For that reason we believe that funding the very best projects after a thorough application process could be a great use of funds. We want to try out a grants project during 2017. If we feel that we have been able to use money well through this project, we will allocate new funds to it in 2018.

We want to use the grants to increase the diversity of approaches within effective altruism. We believe that untested strategies could yield significant information value for the effective altruism community, and will fund projects accordingly. We hope that the Effective Altruism Grants will also allow people from less privileged backgrounds (and therefore less financial stability) to pursue the highest expected value career paths open to them.

What projects could get funded?

We welcome applications from individuals of any background and hope that applicants will include senior professionals and academics as well as recent graduates. Our hope is to fund a diverse array of projects, both in terms of causes and approaches.

In terms of length and size, we are both looking to give large grants to longer projects (up to £100,000, e.g., over more than a year), and smaller grants to shorter projects, or parts of projects (e.g., £10,000 (~$13,000) over a three-month period). The smaller grants could go to applicants who wish to transition into a more impactful career or who want to get started on a larger project. Grants of any size may be renewed. If you have a project that would require significantly more than £100,000, we still encourage you to apply as we may be able to find you funding from other sources. 

Similarly, due to legal restrictions, CEA may not be able to fund certain types of projects. However, if the project seems promising, we may, with your permission, share your application with other individuals who are looking to fund projects in the effective altruism movement. 

We welcome applications in the following areas:

Some illustrative examples:  

How the grants work

Evaluation criteria

Our evaluation criteria are:

In addition, any project funded by CEA must further CEA's charitable objects.

We are an equal opportunity organization and value diversity. We do not discriminate on the basis of religion, color, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, age, marital status, or disability status. Please contact us to discuss adjustments to the application process.

Application process

Applicants should apply through this application form. The deadline for applications is 1 July 2017. Please send any inquiries to eagrants@centreforeffectivealtruism.org.

Applications will be blinded to assessors. After an initial screening, the most promising candidates will be invited to interviews in the week of 24th July. These candidates will have three separate short interviews. Applications for smaller grants will other things equal have a proportionately greater chance of success. Assessors will recuse themselves if there is a conflict of interest. We aim to make the final decisions by 1 August.

Any promising projects that do not further CEA's objects, as well as the most promising rejected applications may, with permission, be presented to other significant effective altruist donors. These donors may at some as yet undecided point in time choose to fund some of those applicants.

* * *

[1]: Our charitable objects are listed in the "Documents" tab of this site

16 comments

Comments sorted by top scores.

comment by riceissa · 2017-06-11T02:38:30.700Z · EA(p) · GW(p)

How does this compare to EA Ventures?

Replies from: William_MacAskill
comment by William_MacAskill · 2017-06-13T11:19:07.435Z · EA(p) · GW(p)

It is a successor to EA Ventures, though EA Grants already has funding, and is more focused on individuals than start-up projects.

comment by Josh Jacobson (joshjacobson) · 2017-06-13T07:14:52.749Z · EA(p) · GW(p)

Have you already raised the funds for this? EA Ventures failed a while back primarily because there was not the money, and those in charge of it found that they had a much more difficult time raising funds than they expected.

Replies from: Maxdalton
comment by MaxDalton (Maxdalton) · 2017-06-13T11:14:21.230Z · EA(p) · GW(p)

Yes, this project is fully funded, from donations from a large donor given for this purpose.

Replies from: weeatquince
comment by weeatquince · 2017-06-19T09:06:00.845Z · EA(p) · GW(p)

On this topic...

I would be interested in a write up of EA Ventures and why it did not seem to work (did it fail) and what can be learned from it. I think there is significant value in learning for the EA community in writing up projects like this even if they went wrong.

Similarly I would be interested in seeing the write up of the Pareto fellowship - another program that possibly (it is unclear) was not the success that was hoped for.

If it is the case (I hope it would be the case) that CEA has an internal write-up of these projects but not a publishable one I can try to find a trustworthy London based volunteer who could re-write it up for you. Or it might be a good project for a summer intern.

comment by MichaelPlant · 2017-06-09T11:52:17.078Z · EA(p) · GW(p)

This is all very exciting and I'm glad to see this is happening.

A couple of comments.

  1. The deadline for this is only three weeks, which seems quite tight.

  2. Could you give examples of the types of things you wouldn't fund or are very unlikely to fund? That avoids you getting lots of applications you don't want as well as people spending time submitting applications that will get rejected. For instance, would/could CEA provide seed funding for any for altruistic for profit organisations, like start-ups? Asking for a friend...

Replies from: Maxdalton
comment by MaxDalton (Maxdalton) · 2017-06-09T13:50:18.620Z · EA(p) · GW(p)
  1. We have set a tight deadline in order to allow us to process applications before the start of the academic year, since we see funding for study as one of the main use cases. If the project is successful, we will set more generous deadlines in the future.

  2. CEA may not be able to fund for-profit organisations, because we have to use money to further our charitable objects. However, we encourage applications from for-profits. We may then, with the applicant's permission, share information about the projects with private donors who might provide funding. In general, there aren't classes of projects that we won't consider: we want to cast the net wide. However, if others are unsure, I recommend that they email eagrants@centreforeffectivealtruism.org to clarify on a case-by-case basis.

comment by Denkenberger · 2017-06-11T01:45:24.027Z · EA(p) · GW(p)

Great idea! Do you want a 16 page CV or a 2 page resume? If CV, how do you want one to anonymize publications?

Replies from: Maxdalton
comment by MaxDalton (Maxdalton) · 2017-06-12T07:21:16.263Z · EA(p) · GW(p)

Thanks! Please use the resume.

comment by [deleted] · 2017-06-09T22:21:55.936Z · EA(p) · GW(p)

Would anyone be interested in an EA prediction market, where trading profits were donated to the EA charity of the investor's choosing, and the contracts were based on outcomes important to EAs (examples below)?

  • Will a nation state launch a nuclear weapon in 2017 that kills more than 1,000 people?

  • Will one of the current top five fast food chains offer an item containing cultured meat before 2023?

  • Will the total number of slaughtered farm animals in 2017 be less than that in 2016?

  • Will the 2017 infant mortality rate in the DRC be less than 5%?

Replies from: Daniel_Eth, lukeprog
comment by Daniel_Eth · 2017-06-15T04:17:19.009Z · EA(p) · GW(p)

While I'm generally in favor of the idea of prediction markets, I think we need to consider the potential negative PR from betting on catastrophes. So while betting on whether a fast food chain offers cultured meat before a certain date would probably be fine, I think it would be a really bad idea to bet on nuclear weapons being used.

comment by lukeprog · 2017-06-14T20:13:18.898Z · EA(p) · GW(p)

For context (plausibly Mac already knows this): At least in the U.S., real-money prediction markets are apparently legal so long as the profits from successful bets do not go to the bettors (e.g. because they go to charity instead): see Bet2Give. As I understand it, Bet2Give didn't become popular enough to be sustainable — perhaps because not enough players were motivated to participate given that they couldn't actually receive monetary rewards for successful bets.

Replies from: John_Maxwell_IV
comment by John_Maxwell (John_Maxwell_IV) · 2017-07-09T03:05:14.158Z · EA(p) · GW(p)

My suspicion is that prediction markets on 'boring' topics will only take off if they are heavily subsidized.

comment by praline · 2017-06-13T13:55:12.253Z · EA(p) · GW(p)

Hoping to secure PhD study and have an EA-related research proposal. I've noticed the application characters limit is quite strict, so quite likely won't be able to explain much of the proposal in that. Should I attach it to my CV or should I just explain it very very briefly in the application?

Replies from: Maxdalton
comment by MaxDalton (Maxdalton) · 2017-06-13T13:58:46.537Z · EA(p) · GW(p)

You should write it briefly in the application. As the form mentions, the character limit is deliberately strict to encourage you to focus on the most important issues.

Replies from: praline
comment by praline · 2017-06-13T17:22:06.394Z · EA(p) · GW(p)

Thanks!