Introducing Ayuda Efectiva

post by pmelchor · 2020-11-12T13:08:26.715Z · EA · GW · 5 comments

Contents

  Our goals
  The back story
  Ayuda Efectiva today
    Health Fund
    coverage
    activities
  Future plans
  How you can help
    anywhere
    Spain
None
5 comments

A few months ago (June 2020) we launched Ayuda Efectiva, a new EA-aligned nonprofit that makes effective giving easily accessible (and tax-deductible) for donors in Spain. 

In this post we explain what Ayuda Efectiva is trying to accomplish, how we are going about it and what you can do to help us —if so inclined :-)—.

 

Our goals

Ayuda Efectiva has the long-term mission of developing a culture of effective giving in Spain. Our charitable purposes include:

Cause neutrality is a non-starter when setting up a registered charity in Spain. We therefore tried to define broadly-stated purposes (for example, “protecting human life” also covers existential risks), but there are inevitable limitations.

The back story

Note: This section is a first-person summary of how Ayuda Efectiva came to be. I am guessing some people may find it useful or may want to chat about starting new organizations (or any other aspect of the story). Feel free to skip it if you are not interested in this side of things.

I first thought of setting up an EA-aligned foundation in Spain back in early 2018, after going through the well-known "I found this EA thing; have been reading about it non-stop ever since; this is what I want to do; how on Earth do I find a way to contribute" phase. I had been an entrepreneur for 18 years, and it made sense to think I could have a comparative advantage for starting new organizations.

Nevertheless, I ended up devoting the next year and a half to community building [? · GW] (partly thanks to a grant [? · GW] from the Centre for Effective Altruism). I co-founded EA Spain and worked with Jaime Sevilla [EA · GW], two other Pablos (Moreno and Villalobos) and other great local EAs to make the community larger, more vibrant and more useful. I met amazing community builders from all over the world. I attended EA Global London twice. I got to connect with dozens of people in the international community and developed a much better understanding of effective altruism (I am now very glad I did not jump straight into setting up a new organization).

In the meantime, I’d been speaking to some investors in my previous companies, and also to fellow entrepreneurs, about EA and the Spanish foundation project. I kept getting good feedback and several people told me I could count on their support and seed funding to get the project started. I finally decided to focus on what would become Ayuda Efectiva for several reasons:

This last year, my main focus has been to build Ayuda Efectiva from the ground up. The bureaucratic process has been long and bumpy: this was expected, so it just required some  patience and perseverance. Now we have a new organization and it is time to do something with it.

Ayuda Efectiva today

We are thinking of Ayuda Efectiva as a startup, and are trying to build it up with the lowest possible fixed costs. This may mean our progress is slower, but also that keeping the organization running will not be a constant worry that distracts us from our actual goals.

Global Health Fund

Our minimum viable product for launch was a Global Health Fund that uses donations to fund a pre-established selection of GiveWell's recommended charities.

As I mentioned above, our operational costs are currently covered by the seed funding from a group of local donors. However, when users donate to our Global Health Fund, they can also add an additional amount to support Ayuda Efectiva. On average our donors are choosing to support us with an amount equal to 8% of their donations to the Global Health Fund.

Media coverage

We have engaged a PR agency from the start and we are slowly being covered by well-known Spanish media. I am well aware of the general reticence about mass media and the preference for a high fidelity model of spreading the ideas of effective altruism. However, I think that (1) the misrepresentation risks are less acute in the narrower effective-giving space and (2) some coverage —even if it is a bit off-target— can often be better than no coverage when you are launching a new organization.

Other activities

As part of our goal of promoting effective altruism in Spain, we are now maintaining the small public channels that we launched at EA Spain (newsletter, Facebook, Twitter).

Future plans

It is hard to strike the right balance between focus and experimentation. We are barely getting started and are still far from getting the basics right. We also know that many ideas and tasks in our backlog will simply never get done.

Nevertheless, here are a few things we would like to try and hopefully achieve:

How you can help

From anywhere

From Spain

Thanks!

· · ·

Thanks to Jaime Sevilla for the nudge to write this long-overdue post (including a few lines on a Google Doc to overcome the blank page syndrome).

5 comments

Comments sorted by top scores.

comment by Kerry_Vaughan · 2020-11-18T21:55:48.828Z · EA(p) · GW(p)

I am well aware of the general reticence about mass media and the preference for a high fidelity model of spreading the ideas of effective altruism. However, I think that (1) the misrepresentation risks are less acute in the narrower effective-giving space and (2) some coverage —even if it is a bit off-target— can often be better than no coverage when you are launching a new organization.

I want to express some general support for being less concerned about fidelity when spreading ideas like effective giving.

Something that I didn't discuss in the article on fidelity is risk assessment. While all ideas are susceptible to misunderstandings as they spread, not all misunderstandings are equally harmful. Effective giving appears to be a relatively low-risk idea to spread both both because the idea seems to be close to society's existing concepts and because there have been a number of past attempts at spreading the idea without any particular problematic results (I'd be interested in counterexamples if anyone knows of any).

comment by devon_fritz · 2020-11-12T17:44:57.527Z · EA(p) · GW(p)

Great work, Pablo! I think we need more projects like this so glad to see another one.

On that topic, do you or anyone else know of other such national level projects, aside from Effektiv Spenden  (where I do some work) in Germany and RC Forward in Canada? Although I imagine there are many nuances of each country's bureaucracy, it could make sense to template out the operational aspects that likely don't differ from country to country.

 

Another with this bit:

We are thinking of Ayuda Efectiva as a startup, and are trying to build it up with the lowest possible fixed costs. This may mean our progress is slower, but also that keeping the organization running will not be a constant worry that distracts us from our actual goals.

What kind of fixed costs are we talking about, if you don't mind sharing? If they were too low, I'd be a bit concerned that it could hamper your multiplier. How are you approaching fundraising?

Again, great work!

comment by BrianTan · 2020-11-13T03:56:22.805Z · EA(p) · GW(p)

EA Brazil did a similar project called DoeBem, but they've since stopped it. You can read more about it here: https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/Ti7hHFbsK4aDWanjj/what-has-ea-brazil-been-up-to

comment by pmelchor · 2020-11-12T18:35:26.157Z · EA(p) · GW(p)

Devon, thanks for the comment!

On that topic, do you or anyone else know of other such national level projects, aside from Effektiv Spenden  (where I do some work) in Germany and RC Forward in Canada?

I know of gieffektivt.no in Norway and Effective Altruism Australia.

Although I imagine there are many nuances of each country's bureaucracy, it could make sense to template out the operational aspects that likely don't differ from country to country.

Certainly. I had a brief conversation with Basti and Jack Lewars on this. I am very skeptical about large and complex projects like migrating to the same ERP but would be happy to explore more modest opportunities to avoid repeatedly reinventing the wheel :-)

What kind of fixed costs are we talking about, if you don't mind sharing? If they were too low, I'd be a bit concerned that it could hamper your multiplier. How are you approaching fundraising?

Fair concern and you are right: "the lowest possible fixed costs" can mean anything :-). In our case, we are looking at costs of less than 10K €/month for 2021. The plan is to bootstrap this (which we can afford) until we can show impact. The metric we will be focusing on is what The Life You Can Save calls leverage ratio: money moved expressed as a multiple of operating expenses. If you are interested in getting into the weeds, I'd be happy to chat :-)  

comment by pmelchor · 2020-11-12T13:40:03.441Z · EA(p) · GW(p)

I made a minor edit to clarify a couple of points in "How you can help".