New Top EA Causes for 2020? 2020-04-01T07:39:59.687Z
April Fool's Day Is Very Serious Business 2020-03-13T09:16:37.023Z
Open Thread #46 2020-03-13T08:01:31.342Z
Should you familiarize yourself with the literature before writing an EA Forum post? 2019-10-06T23:17:09.317Z
[Link] How to contribute to the psychedelics ecosystem 2019-09-28T01:55:14.267Z
How to Make Billions of Dollars Reducing Loneliness 2019-08-24T01:49:45.629Z
New Top EA Cause: Flying Cars 2019-04-01T20:56:47.829Z
Open Thread #43 2018-12-08T05:39:37.672Z
Open Thread #41 2018-09-03T02:21:51.927Z
Five books to make you super effective 2015-04-02T02:31:48.509Z


Comment by John_Maxwell (John_Maxwell_IV) on What Makes Outreach to Progressives Hard · 2021-05-23T05:15:21.440Z · EA · GW

Just for reference, there's a group kinda like Resource Generation called Generation Pledge that got a grant from the EA Meta Fund. I think they've got a bit more of an EA emphasis.

Comment by John_Maxwell (John_Maxwell_IV) on Insights into mentoring from WANBAM · 2021-05-18T18:06:42.861Z · EA · GW

We are currently actively exploring how we can scale and provide mentoring support, in addition to WANBAM, to our community (those who are interested in/ inspired by Effective Altruism) more broadly.

You probably thought of this, but I suppose you could move in more of an 80K-ish direction by asking mentees to take notes on the best generalizable advice they get in their mentoring conversations, then periodically publishing compilations of this (perhaps organized by topic or something). If I was a mentor, I think I'd be more willing to spend time mentoring if my advice was going to scale beyond a single person.

Comment by John_Maxwell (John_Maxwell_IV) on EA is a Career Endpoint · 2021-05-18T11:47:54.556Z · EA · GW

My sense is that Triplebyte focuses on "can this person think like an engineer" and "which specific math/programming skills do they have, and how strong are they?" Then companies do a second round of interviews where they evaluate Triplebyte candidates for company culture. Triplebyte handles the general, companies handle the idiosyncratic.

I used to work as an interviewer for TripleByte. Most companies using TripleByte put TripleByte-certified candidates through their standard technical onsite. From what I was able to gather, the value prop for companies working with TripleByte is mostly about 1. expanding their sourcing pipeline to include more quality candidates and 2. cutting down on the amount of time their engineers spend administering screens to candidates who aren't very good.

Some of your comments make it sound like a TB like service for EA has to be a lot better than what EA orgs are currently doing to screen candidates. Personally, I suspect there's a lot of labor-saving value to capture if it is merely just as good (or even a bit worse) than current screens. It might also help organizations consider a broader range of people.

Comment by John_Maxwell (John_Maxwell_IV) on Introducing High Impact Athletes · 2021-03-31T09:00:12.023Z · EA · GW

Ryan Carey suggests that athletes could have an impact by giving EA presentations to high schoolers.

Comment by John_Maxwell (John_Maxwell_IV) on Geographic diversity in EA · 2021-03-31T04:54:09.521Z · EA · GW

But it's not easy to visit or live in an EA hub city like London or San Francisco, for most of the global population (financially, legally, for family reasons) ... Fewer like-minded people around you means you have to put in a lot more effort to stay engaged and informed

EA Anywhere might help :-)

Comment by John_Maxwell (John_Maxwell_IV) on RyanCarey's Shortform · 2021-03-31T03:51:59.565Z · EA · GW


Comment by John_Maxwell (John_Maxwell_IV) on How much does performance differ between people? · 2021-03-30T23:29:51.791Z · EA · GW

It might be worth discussing the larger question which is being asked. For example, your IMO paper seems to be work by researchers who advocate looser immigration policies for talented youth who want to move to developed countries. The larger question is "What is the expected scientific impact of letting a marginal IMO medalist type person from Honduras immigrate to the US?"

These quotes from great mathematicians all downplay the importance of math competitions. I think this is partially because the larger question they're interested in is different, something like: "How many people need go into math for us to reap most of the mathematical breakthroughs that this generation is capable of?"

Comment by John_Maxwell (John_Maxwell_IV) on How much does performance differ between people? · 2021-03-30T22:40:40.384Z · EA · GW

YC having a low acceptance rate could mean they are highly confident in their ability to predict ex ante outcomes. It could also mean that they get a lot of unserious applications. Essays such as this one by Paul Graham bemoaning the difficulty of predicting ex ante outcomes make me think it is more the latter. ("it's mostly luck once you get down to the top 1-5%" makes it sound to me like ultra-successful startups should have elite founders, but my take on Graham's essay is that ultra-successful startups tend to be unusual, often in a way that makes them look non-elite according to traditional metrics -- I tend to suspect this is true of exceptionally innovative people more generally)

Comment by John_Maxwell (John_Maxwell_IV) on Apply now for EA Global: Reconnect (March 20-21) · 2021-03-20T00:11:17.636Z · EA · GW

Glad I could help :D

Comment by John_Maxwell (John_Maxwell_IV) on Apply now for EA Global: Reconnect (March 20-21) · 2021-03-13T00:53:05.095Z · EA · GW

They drifted away from the community, but are they still working towards EA goals?

  • If they have stopped working towards EA goals, going to this event could be an opportunity to explore whether this is a decision they [still] endorse.

  • If they have continued to work towards EA goals on their own, going to this event could be a good opportunity to learn & share the kind of things that are most readily learned & shared through face-to-face chitchat. (A fairly large set of things, in my experience.) Additionally, making new face-to-face connections with people lets you trade favors and establish collaborative relationships that are harder to establish through e.g. sending them a cold email. (See: EA is vetting-constrained.) I expect the benefit here will be high variance. There's a high probability you have a weekend full of friendly-but-useless video calls (which will hopefully help with quarantine blues at least!) There's a small probability that you end up learning or sharing something that makes a big difference for you or someone else, or making an important new connection. (If someone hasn't been interacting with the community as much, I expect this probability to be higher, since the backlog of conversations they haven't had and new people they haven't met is gonna be larger.)

Might be worth noting the conventional wisdom in the business world, that networking is really important. As EAs we might have a bias towards things which are more measurable and legible, and I don't think the benefits of networking are always like that.

I noticed the following facts about people who work with the door open or the door closed. I notice that if you have the door to your office closed, you get more work done today and tomorrow, and you are more productive than most. But 10 years later somehow you don't know quite know what problems are worth working on; all the hard work you do is sort of tangential in importance. He who works with the door open gets all kinds of interruptions, but he also occasionally gets clues as to what the world is and what might be important. Now I cannot prove the cause and effect sequence because you might say, ``The closed door is symbolic of a closed mind.'' I don't know. But I can say there is a pretty good correlation between those who work with the doors open and those who ultimately do important things, although people who work with doors closed often work harder. Somehow they seem to work on slightly the wrong thing - not much, but enough that they miss fame.

Richard Hamming, Turing award winner, on what he observed at Bell Labs

Comment by John_Maxwell (John_Maxwell_IV) on Why Hasn't Effective Altruism Grown Since 2015? · 2021-03-10T08:38:35.482Z · EA · GW

Would it be better for people to describe their "conversion" experiences on a Forum thread?

I suspect the EA Survey is the ideal place to ask this sort of question because selection effects will be lowest that way. The best approach might be to gather some qualitative written responses, try to identify clusters in the responses or dimensions along which the responses vary, then formulate quantitative survey questions based on the clusters/dimensions identified.

Comment by John_Maxwell (John_Maxwell_IV) on Negative counterfactual impact of starting new charities · 2021-03-08T11:16:13.886Z · EA · GW

Will MacAskill wrote an article which discussed funding cannibalism here. Unfortunately the article seems to be behind a registration wall now; I don't know how deep his investigation was.

Comment by John_Maxwell (John_Maxwell_IV) on Why do content blockers still suck? · 2021-01-22T13:51:05.675Z · EA · GW

Sorry to hear about that.

I don't think there is anything on the market which blocks things by default

Not sure if this is helpful, but I turn my internet blocker on every night before bed, and only turn it on the next day after a self-imposed mandatory waiting period.

Comment by John_Maxwell (John_Maxwell_IV) on Why do content blockers still suck? · 2021-01-19T21:54:14.524Z · EA · GW

Most content blockers are free, right? Maybe what's going on is: there aren't incentives to make a free offering really good, but the existence of free offerings will discourage people from creating paid offerings. is a paid offering that looks like it might address some of your complaints.

Comment by John_Maxwell (John_Maxwell_IV) on AMA: Elizabeth Edwards-Appell, former State Representative · 2021-01-11T12:25:35.209Z · EA · GW

Now that you have firsthand experience of the incentives that public office-holders (and candidates for public office) face, how do you think those incentives could be improved? Trying to take a meta approach here ;-)

Comment by John_Maxwell (John_Maxwell_IV) on Can I have impact if I’m average? · 2021-01-05T11:39:23.428Z · EA · GW

A couple reasons to be skeptical of the "top 1%" idea:

  • It does seem true that some people are much more famous than others, but I don't think we can trust the distribution of fame to accurately reflect the distribution of contributions. The famous CEO may get all the credit, but maybe they couldn't have done it without a whole host of key employees.

  • Even if the distribution of actual contributions is skewed, that doesn't mean we can reliably predict the big contributors in advance. I found this paper which says work sample tests used in hiring ("suggested to be among the most valid predictors") only weakly correlate with job performance. Speaking for myself, a few years ago some EAs I respected told me "John, I don't think you are cut out for X." That sounded plausible to me at the time, but I decided to take a shot at X anyways, and I now believe their assessment was incorrect.

Longer exposition here.

But at the end of the day, constantly comparing yourself to others is not a good mental habit. Better to compare yourself with yourself. Which version of yourself will do more good: The version of yourself which wallows in despair, or the version of yourself which identifies people you think are doing great stuff and asks "Is there something I can do to help?" Last I checked, we have long lists of EA project ideas which aren't getting worked on.

Comment by John_Maxwell (John_Maxwell_IV) on My mistakes on the path to impact · 2020-12-07T06:08:34.474Z · EA · GW

See also answers here mentioning that EA feels "intellectually stale". A friend says he thinks a lot of impressive people have left the EA movement because of this :(

I feel bad, because I think maybe I was one of the first people to push the "avoid accidental harm" thing.

Comment by John_Maxwell (John_Maxwell_IV) on Should marginal longtermist donations support fundamental or intervention research? · 2020-12-01T04:43:53.409Z · EA · GW

I suspect you want a mix of both, and fundamental research helps inform what kind of intervention research is useful, but intervention research also helps inform what kind of fundamental research is useful. Given a long-term effect, you can try to find a lever which achieves that effect, or given a big lever that's available for pulling, you can and try to figure out what its long-term effect is likely to be.

Comment by John_Maxwell (John_Maxwell_IV) on A Case and Model for Aggressively Funding Effective Charities · 2020-09-28T02:00:03.261Z · EA · GW

Sure, but if you only award prizes for the latter, I think people will gradually recognize the difference.

Maybe your point is that the opinions of loudmouths like myself will be overrepresented in such a scheme? Allowing for private submissions could help address that.

Comment by John_Maxwell (John_Maxwell_IV) on A Case and Model for Aggressively Funding Effective Charities · 2020-09-25T09:42:32.166Z · EA · GW

In terms of hearing diverse perspectives, I suspect there are more effective ways to accomplish that goal than having diverse funders. For example, a funder could require that a nonprofit lay their thinking out publicly in detail, and offer prizes for the best critiques other people write in response to their thinking. That way you're optimizing for hearing from people who think they have something to add.

Comment by John_Maxwell (John_Maxwell_IV) on Deliberate Consumption of Emotional Content to Increase Altruistic Motivation · 2020-09-14T11:53:28.269Z · EA · GW

I thought this recent Netflix documentary which talks a lot about Bill Gates' charity work was fairly inspiring (and informative). I haven't tried watching videos of suffering... I doubt it would be very motivating for the sort of study/brainstorm/write EA work I most want myself to do.

Comment by John_Maxwell (John_Maxwell_IV) on AMA: Owen Cotton-Barratt, RSP Director · 2020-09-03T09:37:22.886Z · EA · GW

Why not just have the people who need mentorship serve as "research personal assistants" to improve the productivity of people who are qualified to provide mentorship? (This describes something which occurs between professors and graduate students right?)

Comment by John_Maxwell (John_Maxwell_IV) on What are novel major insights from longtermist macrostrategy or global priorities research found since 2015? · 2020-08-15T06:23:28.329Z · EA · GW

At time T0, someone suggests X as a joke.

Telling jokes as an EA cause.

Comment by John_Maxwell (John_Maxwell_IV) on EA Cameroon - COVID-19 Awareness and Prevention in the Santa Division of Cameroon Project Proposal · 2020-07-23T03:30:47.896Z · EA · GW

I have no idea, I already shared my notes above! :) Perhaps the team could reach out to e.g. the author of the Johns Hopkins article?

BTW, I did find this article which argues for knitted masks:

However, I'm more inclined to trust Johns Hopkins. But maybe the author of the Johns Hopkins article would have interesting opinions on the above link.

Edit: Here's more info

Comment by John_Maxwell (John_Maxwell_IV) on EA Cameroon - COVID-19 Awareness and Prevention in the Santa Division of Cameroon Project Proposal · 2020-07-22T03:42:54.148Z · EA · GW

Hm, socks are knitted not woven, right?

Comment by John_Maxwell (John_Maxwell_IV) on AMA or discuss my 80K podcast episode: Ben Garfinkel, FHI researcher · 2020-07-20T07:25:59.659Z · EA · GW

My guess would be that if you play with GPT-3, it can talk about as well about human values (or AI alignment for that matter) as it can talk about anything else. In that sense, it seems like stronger capabilities for GPT-3 also potentially help solve the alignment problem.

Edit: More discussion here:

Comment by John_Maxwell (John_Maxwell_IV) on EA Cameroon - COVID-19 Awareness and Prevention in the Santa Division of Cameroon Project Proposal · 2020-07-20T06:56:51.977Z · EA · GW

Since you requested feedback, here are some quick thoughts:

While I very much hope Cameroon is able to bring COVID under control, it seems like this could be difficult based on what we've seen in other countries. So the part of your plan that I'm most optimistic about is the mask making, because I think that could save lives even if COVID is not brought under control. Somewhere I read (can't remember where unfortunately) that if you wear a mask, then you'll end up inhaling a smaller number of viral particles if you get exposed to an infected person, and inhaling a smaller number of viral particles tends to give you a milder case, which means you're more likely to acquire immunity without putting your life at risk.

So I'd encourage you think about questions like: After we practice explaining the mask-making process in our workshops, can we find a way to explain mask-making via radio / flyers / newspaper articles? Or can we tell everyone at our mask-making workshops that they should run their own mask-making workshops for their family and friends and so on, so the mask-making knowledge spreads through the population that way?

Additionally, from what I've read some homemade masks are much more effective than others. Some snippets from my notes on mask effectiveness:

The test produced a few clear winners. While droplets from the average cough traveled around eight feet from an uncovered face, they went only 2.5 inches when produced behind a mask made of two layers of simple cotton quilting fabric. A mask made from a folded handkerchief produced droplets that traveled a bit over a foot. A loose, single-ply cotton bandana didn’t fare as well: While it prevented some fluid release, the cough’s plume still traveled nearly four feet.

“Whenever you have the option, use tightly woven fabric that has minimal leakage,” Verma concludes. “Any sort of covering is better than none.”

Thicker, more densely woven cotton fabrics are best, such as quilting cotton or cotton sheets. Stretchy knits aren’t ideal. Hold the fabric up to the light: The fewer tiny holes you can see, the better it will work to filter droplets.

The fabric should be a woven fabric, not a knitted fabric. What’s the difference? Woven fabrics don’t stretch much, so when you tie it around your face, the tiny holes between the threads don’t get bigger and let in more viruses.

In recent tests, HEPA furnace filters scored well, as did vacuum cleaner bags, layers of 600-count pillowcases and fabric similar to flannel pajamas. Stacked coffee filters had medium scores. Scarves and bandanna material had the lowest scores, but still captured a small percentage of particles.

If you don’t have any of the materials that were tested, a simple light test can help you decide whether a fabric is a good candidate for a mask.

“Hold it up to a bright light,” said Dr. Scott Segal, chairman of anesthesiology at Wake Forest Baptist Health who recently studied homemade masks. “If light passes really easily through the fibers and you can almost see the fibers, it’s not a good fabric. If it’s a denser weave of thicker material and light doesn’t pass through it as much, that’s the material you want to use.”


Dr. Wang’s group tested two types of air filters. An allergy-reduction HVAC filter worked the best, capturing 89 percent of particles with one layer and 94 percent with two layers. A furnace filter captured 75 percent with two layers, but required six layers to achieve 95 percent. To find a filter similar to those tested, look for a minimum efficiency reporting value (MERV) rating of 12 or higher or a microparticle performance rating of 1900 or higher.

The problem with air filters is that they potentially could shed small fibers that would be risky to inhale. So if you want to use a filter, you need to sandwich the filter between two layers of cotton fabric. Dr. Wang said one of his grad students made his own mask by following the instructions in the C.D.C. video, but adding several layers of filter material inside a bandanna.

Dr. Wang’s group also found that when certain common fabrics were used, two layers offered far less protection than four layers. A 600 thread count pillow case captured just 22 percent of particles when doubled, but four layers captured nearly 60 percent. A thick woolen yarn scarf filtered 21 percent of particles in two layers, and 48.8 percent in four layers. A 100 percent cotton bandanna did the worst, capturing only 18.2 percent when doubled, and just 19.5 percent in four layers.


The best-performing designs were a mask constructed of two layers of high-quality, heavyweight “quilter’s cotton,” a two-layer mask made with thick batik fabric, and a double-layer mask with an inner layer of flannel and outer layer of cotton.


Bonnie Browning, executive show director for the American Quilter’s Society, said that quilters prefer tightly woven cottons and batik fabrics that stand up over time. Ms. Browning said most sewing machines can handle only two layers of fabric when making a pleated mask, but someone who wanted four layers of protection could wear two masks at a time.

...adding a layer of nylon stocking over the masks minimized the flow of air around the edges of the masks and improved particle filtration efficiency for all masks, including all commercial products tested. Use of a nylon stocking overlayer brought the particle filtration efficiency for five of the ten fabric masks above the 3M surgical mask baseline...

So it's probably worth doing some research to figure out the best mask design from the perspective of effectiveness, ease of explaining how to create, and likelihood that people in the Santa Division will be able to acquire the necessary materials, if you haven't already done this.

Comment by John_Maxwell (John_Maxwell_IV) on Concern, and hope · 2020-07-20T05:37:51.168Z · EA · GW

Something I've been doing just a bit lately which seems to be working surprisingly well so far: If I see a polarizing discussion on EA Facebook, and someone writes a comment in a way which seems needlessly combative/confrontational to me, I add them as a friend and private message them trying to persuade them to rewrite their comment.

My general model here is that private 1-on-1 communication is much higher bandwidth, less ego-driven, and more amenable to the resolution of misunderstandings etc. However it's not nearly as scalable (in terms of the size of the audience reached) as a forum discussion is. But private 1-on-1 communication where you try to persuade someone to change their forum writing gets you the best of both worlds.

Another model is that combativeness tends to beget combativeness, so it's high-leverage to try & change the tone of the conversation as early as possible.

Comment by John_Maxwell (John_Maxwell_IV) on The 80,000 Hours podcast should host debates · 2020-07-13T00:42:10.737Z · EA · GW

Another way to accomplish something similar would be to post the podcasts to the EA Forum and have this be the official place for people to comment on them.

Comment by John_Maxwell (John_Maxwell_IV) on EA Cameroon - COVID-19 Awareness and Prevention in the Santa Division of Cameroon Project Proposal · 2020-07-10T03:29:28.066Z · EA · GW

This looks like a great initiative!

I noticed that based on the link in your EA Forum profile, you're located in the Czech Republic--would you mind talking a bit about your relationship with EA Cameroon?

Comment by John_Maxwell (John_Maxwell_IV) on EA Survey 2019 Series: How many people are there in the EA community? · 2020-06-30T00:59:20.281Z · EA · GW

Coming together weekly to meet in person as a movement, like megachurches do, is an interesting thought experiment. Post-COVID, if remote work is the new norm, it might be feasible to locate all of EA in a single city with low cost of living. Would this be a positive change? My intuition says yes, but with high uncertainty. Maybe it's just me being extroverted.

Comment by John_Maxwell (John_Maxwell_IV) on Request for proposal - EA Animal Welfare Fund · 2020-05-29T08:24:18.120Z · EA · GW

Here's a project idea that someone might want to take on.

It's been argued (response) that bivalves have much reduced capacity for suffering compared to other commonly eaten animals. And according to this recent NY times article, "Mollusks like clams, oysters and scallops are also great low-carbon choices."

What could get people to substitute with bivalves? Lowering the price should help. A quick search on Amazon suggests that canned mussel (one of the bivalves highest in Omega-3s according to this chart) is 2-3x as expensive per ounce as canned salmon.

How could the price be reduced? On this US government website, you can see a picture of a guy culling and grading oysters by hand. Google has a case study on its website of a Japanese cucumber farm which used deep learning to sort cucumbers. Could similar technology be developed for bivalves? As a bonus, you could develop AI skills along the way, and potentially make a decent amount of money. It might be best to partner with/be hired by existing efforts in the bivalve automation space... here is one I found on Google.

Comment by John_Maxwell (John_Maxwell_IV) on Tips for overcoming low back pain · 2020-04-18T07:49:40.959Z · EA · GW has been amazing for all my chronic pain problems. Looks like he has a comprehensive guide for low back pain which might be worth checking out:

Comment by John_Maxwell (John_Maxwell_IV) on April Fool's Day Is Very Serious Business · 2020-04-08T09:05:15.231Z · EA · GW


Comment by John_Maxwell (John_Maxwell_IV) on New Top EA Causes for 2020? · 2020-04-02T23:57:16.960Z · EA · GW

I won't stop you! :)

Comment by John_Maxwell (John_Maxwell_IV) on New Top EA Causes for 2020? · 2020-04-02T21:22:18.505Z · EA · GW


Comment by John_Maxwell (John_Maxwell_IV) on New Top EA Causes for 2020? · 2020-04-02T21:21:57.489Z · EA · GW


Comment by John_Maxwell (John_Maxwell_IV) on New Top EA Causes for 2020? · 2020-04-01T08:07:47.059Z · EA · GW

Get Joe Biden To Take Nootropics.

For a while, the 2020 American presidential contest was down to three men: The man with heart trouble, the man with brain trouble, and the man with ego trouble. But now that the man with heart trouble is ranking below Andrew Cuomo, who is not even running, in prediction markets for the Democratic nomination, it is looking increasingly likely that the American public will have to decide whether brain trouble or ego trouble is less disqualifying.

What they should be asking is which of brain trouble or ego trouble is more easily fixed.

It's possible you've heard some buzz in your social circle about brain-enhancing nootropic drugs. One thing you might not know is that in some cases, although the drug appears to be something of a dud for younger folks, it works in oldsters:

While it is known that the human brain endures diverse insults in the process of ageing, food-based nootropics are likely to go a long way in mitigating the impacts of these insults. Further research is needed before we reach a point where food-based nootropics are routinely prescribed.

From a lit review.

...According to a meta-analysis on human studies, piracetam improves general cognition when supplemented by people in a state of cognitive decline, such as the kind that comes with aging. Though piracetam may be a useful supplement for improving longevity, it offers limited benefits for healthy people.

Healthy people supplementing piracetam do experience little to no cognitive benefit. Though piracetam supplementation in healthy people is understudied, preliminary evidence suggests that piracetam is most effective for older people...


In persons with cognitive decline, supplementation of Piracetam was able to reduce aggression and agitation symptoms.

From (Remember from a few news cycles ago: Joe Biden tells factory worker ‘you’re full of shit’ during a tense argument over guns.)

Why might this be a Top EA Cause? In addition to the usual massive responsibilities of being POTUS, America is currently suffering from a pandemic. A 1% improvement in the intelligence of the actions taken by the chief executive could directly and immediately save thousands of lives.

Is it tractable? Yes, but it's not talent or money limited. It's memetics limited. We need to figure out if we have any connections to the Biden campaign who can start planning his meals to keep the bulb as bright as possible. Failing that, we could suggest that a nootropics company form a marketing initiative around this. Or Kelsey could write about it in Vox. Or something.

Don't forget the importance of regular Super Mario 64 play either.

Comment by John_Maxwell (John_Maxwell_IV) on AMA: Toby Ord, author of "The Precipice" and co-founder of the EA movement · 2020-03-22T03:29:16.916Z · EA · GW

What are the most important new ideas in your book for someone who's already been in the EA movement for quite a while?

Comment by John_Maxwell (John_Maxwell_IV) on Are there any public health funding opportunities with COVID-19 that are plausibly competitive with Givewell top charities per dollar? · 2020-03-22T03:16:02.361Z · EA · GW

My best guess is no, but feel like I should throw this question out there in case anyone can think of plausible candidates.

Can you explain your thinking behind this? My model is that COVID-19 will spread to developing countries before too long, and once there, it will quickly become a much bigger problem than malaria etc. So the highest-impact global health intervention would appear to be "beta testing" of anti-COVID-19 interventions that we think can be transferred to a developing country context.

Anyway, this recent post on far-ultraviolet light looks pretty interesting. I'm pretty optimistic about ideas like this which could use the momentum of COVID-19 to overcome regulatory hurdles etc. and then end up being super valuable for other problems going forward.

Comment by John_Maxwell (John_Maxwell_IV) on Advice for getting the most out of one-on-ones · 2020-03-21T05:19:06.043Z · EA · GW

If everyone records their 1-on-1s and rates their value on a scale of 1 to 10, along with various features that might be predictive of 1-on-1 value (e.g. how junior/senior they are, whether you're working on similar problems, whether you are from the same/different countries, your general conversational prompts/questions/conversation topic, etc.) then we can assemble a dataset and develop a predictive model of how valuable a 1-on-1 is likely to be. That helps with choosing who to meet with, and also persuading people to meet with you (if the predictive model says you should meet, that increases the odds they respond), and also knowing what to talk about (check to see which questions/conversation topics are predictive of a valuable 1-on-1).

Actually for the questions/conversation topics part, if I was an EAG attendee, I would start a thread of question/conversation ideas on Facebook or somewhere for people to brainstorm in, and then use some kind of approval voting so people can figure out what the best prompts are over time. If you have a good conversation, try to figure out what prompt could have created that conversation in retrospect then add it to the list.

Comment by John_Maxwell (John_Maxwell_IV) on April Fool's Day Is Very Serious Business · 2020-03-13T22:03:03.730Z · EA · GW

Makes sense, I'll do that.

Comment by John_Maxwell (John_Maxwell_IV) on Open Thread #46 · 2020-03-13T21:54:19.762Z · EA · GW

That occurred to me, but I've noticed myself feeling more willing to post in an Open Thread than post as shortform. LW also has shortform, but despite that, their monthly Open Threads are seeing a lot of activity:

Comment by John_Maxwell (John_Maxwell_IV) on What are the key ongoing debates in EA? · 2020-03-13T06:51:22.514Z · EA · GW

Apology accepted, thanks. I agree on point 2.

Comment by John_Maxwell (John_Maxwell_IV) on Insomnia with an EA lens: Bigger than malaria? · 2020-03-12T06:36:32.881Z · EA · GW

Since this insomnia is apparently a high-impact topic, I might as well share some anecdotes from my own battle with sleep difficulties.

I've had some success with behavioral solutions to insomnia ("don't use screens after 11 PM" type stuff). But the problem with behavioral solutions, in my view, is that they are too brittle. Life always happens and your habit breaks at some point. So in the spirit of Nassim Nicholas Taleb's comments on fragility, I've instead recently focused on finding "robust" or "antifragile" solutions to the problem of getting enough sleep. These tend to be technological. Right now I'm stacking a bunch of different technologies for better sleep:

  • Ebb forehead cooler device
  • Weighted blanket
  • f.lux
  • White noise machine
  • Eye mask
  • Glycine
  • Airway expansion. Note: I haven't gotten a sleep study, and I doubt I would strictly meet the criteria for sleep apnea diagnosis, but I still seem to be benefiting a lot from this.
  • Lying on an acupressure mat. Note: I think the most common explanations for why acupuncture works are pseudoscience. I recommend this book.
  • If I have to get up in the middle of the night, I wear orange glasses to block blue light. I also colored the night lights in our house with a red marker so they emit less blue light.

It might sound like a lot, but the nightly overhead of maintaining this is not high--less than 1% of the time I spend asleep. In aggregate this all seems to improve my sleep considerably in a way that doesn't depend on fragile behavioral interventions. (Some of the most valuable-seeming additions have been pretty recent, so we'll see how things work long term.)

Note: I suspect my sleep problems are more "physiological" than "psychological" in nature. CBT-i might work better for someone whose problems are more psychological.

Comment by John_Maxwell (John_Maxwell_IV) on What are the key ongoing debates in EA? · 2020-03-12T04:24:44.943Z · EA · GW

I just want to note that in principle, large & weird or small & welcoming movements are both possible. 60s counterculture was a large & weird movement. Quakers are a small & welcoming movement. (If you want to be small & welcoming, I guess it helps to not advertise yourself very much.)

I think you are right that there's a debate around whether EA should be sanitized for a mass audience (by not betting on pandemics or whatever). But e.g. this post mentions that caution around growth could be good because growth is hard to reverse, but I don't see weirdness advocacy.

Comment by John_Maxwell (John_Maxwell_IV) on What are the key ongoing debates in EA? · 2020-03-12T04:11:36.726Z · EA · GW

"View X is a rare/unusual view, and therefore it's not a debate." That seems a little... condescending or something?

How are we ever supposed to learn anything new if we don't debate rare/unusual views?

Comment by John_Maxwell (John_Maxwell_IV) on Concerning the Recent 2019-Novel Coronavirus Outbreak · 2020-02-09T05:29:14.393Z · EA · GW

I guess there's an interesting argument here for making casual gambling illegal--based on this thread, it seems like "Bets are serious & somber business, not for frivolous things like horse races" could be a really high value meme to spread.

Comment by John_Maxwell (John_Maxwell_IV) on What should EAs interested in climate change do? · 2020-01-15T08:15:17.248Z · EA · GW

In terms of plant-based alternatives, I think nutrition research could be high-impact and neglected. It seems like people are focused on trying to replicate the taste of meat, but when I experimented with veganism, I found myself wanting meat more the longer I'd gone without it, and experiencing it to be unusually satisfying if I hadn't had it in a long while, which seems more compatible with a nutritional issue -- the same pattern doesn't seem to manifest for other foods I find tasty.

I'm imagining a study which feeds participants a vegan diet along with some randomly chosen nutritional supplements to see which are correlated with reduced desire to eat meat or something like that. Or maybe just better publicizing already known nutrition research / integrating it into plant based meat substitutes -- for example, I just found this article which says iron from red meat is absorbed much more easily -- I do think I was craving red meat specifically relative to other animal products. (Come to think of it, I was also experiencing more fatigue than normal, which seems compatible with mild anemia?)

Comment by John_Maxwell (John_Maxwell_IV) on What should EAs interested in climate change do? · 2020-01-11T07:37:12.768Z · EA · GW

Some related links:

More speculative questions (my own personal uninformed thoughts):

  • Regarding the tree planting option, can we breed trees which are less vulnerable to wildfires?
  • Regarding the marine cloud brightening option - could you make it doubly useful by going to areas which experience periodic flooding and spraying floodwaters up into the air? Maybe you could even get municipalities to pay you and make a business out of it.
  • Kelly and Zach Weinersmith wrote a book called Soonish which says (among other interesting things) that robots which automatically build buildings are on the horizon. To what extent could easy, cheap construction of new buildings and cities help mitigate sealevel rises and other global warming effects?
  • My brother has a physics degree and finds this to be a bit implausible: But it does make me wonder if there's a way to make money by buying land, terraforming it in a way that's good from a climate perspective, and selling the land after it's increased in value.