What are some historical examples of people and organizations who've influenced people to do more good? 2020-04-11T21:44:11.969Z · score: 8 (5 votes)
Advice for getting the most out of one-on-ones 2020-03-21T02:20:40.421Z · score: 17 (13 votes)
A Qualitative Analysis of Value Drift in EA 2020-02-12T05:41:41.804Z · score: 121 (44 votes)
What social movements can EA be compared to? 2019-06-11T23:57:30.187Z · score: 8 (8 votes)
Is value drift net-positive, net-negative, or neither? 2019-05-04T22:01:50.594Z · score: 12 (8 votes)


Comment by marisajurczyk on Yale EA Virtual Fellowship Retrospective - Summer 2020 · 2020-09-28T02:04:51.410Z · score: 1 (1 votes) · EA · GW

Great post! I think you're one of the first uni groups I've seen who's particularly selective with their fellowship - I wouldn't have initially agreed with that strategy, but you give convincing reasons for doing so and it sounds like it paid off. :) Congrats on a successful fellowship round!

Comment by marisajurczyk on Some thoughts on EA outreach to high schoolers · 2020-09-22T00:54:22.590Z · score: 4 (3 votes) · EA · GW
I think one of the best things about hearing about EA pre-college is it would let you set up your college plan (e.g., major, internships) in an EA-directed way

To me, this seems like the best case for engaging with high schoolers over college students. I seem to meet a lot of EAs who study something that doesn't correlate well with most high-impact careers and find themselves wishing they'd heard about EA sooner so they could have studied something more practical.

The major questions I have with this are 1) can you actually convince high schoolers to change their career plans, and 2) if so, will they actually apply EA ideas in a way that increases their impact? (or as opposed to just blindly following 80k recommendations and doing something they don't like or aren't good at.) I guess both are also risks associated with trying to get anyone to make an EA-related career change, but high schoolers seem more at risk to me, particularly with #2 since I think they have less self-awareness regarding their skills and interests.

Comment by marisajurczyk on Are there any other pro athlete aspiring EAs? · 2020-09-13T17:32:16.422Z · score: 3 (2 votes) · EA · GW

Matthew Dellavedova is on Momentum's board, and they're an EA-aligned org, so I suspect he might be EA-sympathetic (or at the very least familiar with it).

Comment by marisajurczyk on The community's conception of value drifting is sometimes too narrow · 2020-09-07T02:15:48.160Z · score: 1 (1 votes) · EA · GW

I've spent a lot of time thinking about this, and I largely agree with you. I also think studying "pure" value drift (as opposed to "symptoms" of value drift, which is what a lot of the research in this area focuses on, including, to some extent, my own) comes with a few challenges. (Epistemic status: Pretty uncertain and writing this in haste. Feel free to tell me why I'm wrong.)

  • EA isn't (supposed to be) dogmatic, and hence doesn't have clearly defined values. We're "effective" and we're "altruistic," and those are more or less the only requirements to being EA. But what is altruism? Is it altruistic to invest in yourself so you can have more of an impact later on in life? Effectiveness, on the surface, seems more objective, since it mostly means relying on high-quality evidence and reasoning. But evidence and reason can get messy and biased, which can make defining effectiveness more difficult. For example, even if valuing effectiveness leads you to choose to believe in interventions that have the most robust evidence, it's possible that that robust evidence might come from p-hacking, publication bias, or studies with an over-representation of middle-class people from high-income countries. At some point effectiveness (from the EA point of view) also hinges on a valuing certainty vs. risk-taking, and probably a number of other sub-values as well.
  • Measuring raw values relies primarily on self-reporting, which is a notoriously unreliable social science method. People often say they value one thing and then act in a contradictory manner. Sometimes it's a signaling thing, but sometimes we just don't really understand ourselves that well. Classic example: a young college student says they don't care much about financial stability, until they actually enter the workforce, get a not-super-well-paid job, and realize that maybe they actually do care. I think this is a big reason why people have chosen to focus on behavior and community involvement. It's the closest thing to objective data we can get.

This isn't an argument against what you've written. I still think a lot of people err on assigning the label "value drift" to things like leaving the EA community that could be caused by a number of different scenarios in which it actually perfectly reflects your values to do that thing. I guess I don't know what the solution is here, but I do think it's worth digging into further.

Comment by marisajurczyk on A curriculum for Effective Altruists · 2020-08-30T02:55:53.392Z · score: 15 (11 votes) · EA · GW

Hmm. On the one hand I think these are all useful topics for an EA to know. But I don't think it's necessary for all EAs to know these things. I think there's a lot of EAs who don't have this technical knowledge, but are happy to outsource decisions relying on this knowledge (such as where to donate) to people who do. That said, I think that often leads to donating less-than-effectively (e.g. giving to whatever EA Fund appeals to you personally, rather than rationally thinking about trade-offs/probabilistic outcomes).

I guess this is, in part, a big-tent vs. elite EA trade-off question. If EA is best as an elite movement, it makes sense that all the members should have this knowledge. But if we want to take an "everyone has a place in EA" approach, then it might not make sense to have a central curriculum.

Also, I don't think we want everyone in EA to have the same skillset. EA isn't, in my view, a single professional field, but perhaps more like a company (although this is probably an oversimplification). If a company gave all of their employees a handbook on How to Be A Great Project Manager, it'd be helpful... for project managers. But the rest of the team ought to be rounding out skills that others in the company don't have that suit their comparative advantage and will move the company forward. The only thing everyone at the company really needs to know is the product. Basic time management / other soft skills are also useful. I don't think we need 100% of EAs to have a solid grounding in economics. Maybe we need ~100% of EAs to trust economics. But I'd rather have some EAs focusing on building skills like movement-building, communications, fundraising, operations/management, entrepreneurship, policy, qualitative research, etc.

Granted, I'm thinking about this from the perspective of careers, rather than being able to participate in discussions in EA spaces. To answer to that aspect of it - although I certainly think it's possible to discuss EA without knowing about economics / statistics / decision analysis knowledge, the conversation does sometimes go in this more technical direction and leave newcomers behind. The question, then, might be whether it's the newcomers who should hold the responsibility of learning this so that they can participate in these discussions, or if the people who are discussing things at such a technical level should adjust the way they discuss these issues to make them more accessible to a non-technical audience. I lean more towards the latter (though it depends on the context).

Comment by marisajurczyk on Examples of loss of jobs due to Covid in EA · 2020-08-30T02:15:10.542Z · score: 11 (4 votes) · EA · GW

I haven't actually heard of any EA organizations laying off staff due to COVID-19. I wouldn't be surprised if you see very little loss of jobs at EA orgs specifically, or even none at all, over the last couple of months. Most EA organizations seem to have a decent amount of runway, and with a lot of EA donors employed in big tech, which seems to have been relatively stable throughout COVID, there is fortunately still a decent amount of income coming through.

That said, I suspect most of the financial and hence employment impacts of COVID on EA orgs will be in the future as organizations eat into their runway, especially this giving season if donors give significantly less than usual. If there's a big loss of jobs in EA orgs, I'd suspect it to hit around January or February, after organizations take stock after giving season.

Comment by marisajurczyk on What opportunities are there to use data science in global priorities research? · 2020-08-22T18:19:58.135Z · score: 6 (4 votes) · EA · GW

If you haven't already, I'd reach out directly to GPR organizations and mention that you're interested in applying your skillset to their work. They might be able to provide you with some concrete examples and a better idea of what's available in the field.

Comment by marisajurczyk on Has anyone carried out analysis on who we should focus on to grow the movement? · 2020-08-22T17:46:46.533Z · score: 1 (1 votes) · EA · GW

I heard in mid-2019 that Open Phil was interviewing EAs to identify common characteristics / background among people are most receptive to EA. I don't think it was published though.

Comment by marisajurczyk on When Planning Your Career, Start Early · 2020-08-14T06:27:15.071Z · score: 7 (4 votes) · EA · GW

Strongly agree with your points, although I also don't think they're mutually exclusive to the content of this post.

I think some of the most value I got out of university (and high school, to be honest) was the ability to try out a bunch of things at once with relative ease. I have a lot of interests that change and come and go rather quickly, and in the university setting, it was strangely easy to get involved in whatever new thing that caught my attention, whether via a course, a club, meetings with a professor, an internship, a volunteer opportunity, etc. (Though I attended a small liberal arts college, which might have made this process easier.) I learned a lot about what I like, what I don't like, what I'm good at and what I suck at a lot more quickly than I think I could outside of university, and I think a lot of this became valuable data for deciding on a career, in addition to opening doors to opportunities.

I think a common mistake I see in university students is thinking "I just want to focus on school" for their first three years, trying to secure an internship during the summer of their junior year, and then hoping that's sufficient to get them a job. I don't think this is a great idea. At the same time, I think narrowly focusing on identifying and pursuing a high-income, stable career path (or whatever one's ideal career plan looks like) carries a lot of risk of burnout, poor performance, and misery if you're unlucky enough to get it wrong. I think I see more students err in the former direction that the latter though, although I imagine EA students probably have a higher tendency to over-optimize their career path.

I guess I somewhat lucked out in that a) my courseload was light enough that it allowed me to get very involved outside of class, and b) a lot of the things I was excited about were also employable skills. I guess if this isn't the case for someone, the "seek joy" and "plan your career" might come more into conflict, but that wasn't my experience.

Comment by marisajurczyk on For those working on longtermist projects, how do you stay motivated in the short-term? · 2020-08-14T04:42:55.871Z · score: 3 (2 votes) · EA · GW

I'm afraid I don't have any original recommendations, but have you read the EA Handbook Motivation Series? Nate Soares' 'On Caring' might be particularly relevant.

I was also talking with some other EAs about this recently and one of them mentioned Metta meditation, which is essentially a meditation that focuses on creating an expanding circle of goodwill, which could hypothetically include the long-term future. If meditation is your thing, it might be worth a shot.

Comment by marisajurczyk on Replaceability Concerns and Possible Responses · 2020-08-14T03:57:49.842Z · score: 7 (3 votes) · EA · GW

Great post! Been meaning to comment for a while - better late than never than suppose.

One thing I wanted to add - I've talked with ~50 people who are interested in working at EA orgs over the last six months or so, and it seems like a lot of them come to the decision through process of elimination. Common trends I see:

  • They don't feel well-suited for policy, often because it's too bureaucratic or requires a high level of social skills.
  • They don't feel well-suited for academia, usually because they have less-than-stellar marks or dislike the expected output or bureaucracy of academia.
  • And they aren't interested in earning-to-give, almost always because of a lack of cultural fit. (They want to have colleagues who are also motivated to do good in the world.)

Per 80,000 Hours recommended career paths, that pretty much leaves working at effective nonprofits as the only option. And conveniently, nonprofit work (especially non-research roles) doesn't usually come with a high bar of qualifications. A lot of positions don't require a bachelor's degree. Depending on the role, it's not uncommon to find a year of vaguely-defined experience as the only minimum qualification for an entry-level job. So that seems like a reasonable choice for a lot of people... except that hundreds of other EAs also see this as a reasonable choice, and the competition grows very quickly.

I've certainly met EAs who seem really well-suited for direct work at EA orgs. But, in part because of the reasons mentioned above, I think the majority of people would be better off focusing their jobseeking efforts somewhere else. I do worry about swinging the pendulum too far in the opposite direction, where talented people stop applying for EA organizations.

I guess my recommendation for people interested in direct work would be to apply to EA organizations that interest you and that you think fit your skillset, but, at the same time, to also apply for EA-aligned organizations and/or impactful non-EA jobs where replaceability is likely to be lower. I also think, if you're uncertain about whether to apply for or accept an EA direct work role, you can usually talk to the hiring manager about what they feel like your counterfactual impact might be. The nice thing about applying EA orgs is that they understand those concerns, and it likely won't negatively affect your application - in fact, it might reflect positively on you for thinking critically and altruistically (for lack of a better word) about your career.

Comment by marisajurczyk on Recommendations for increasing empathy? · 2020-08-02T11:03:42.260Z · score: 5 (3 votes) · EA · GW

Came here to recommend Replacing Guilt as well! Was very impactful for me :)

And we'd love to have you at one of our EA Virtual Group meetups! You can join our new Slack workspace here

Comment by marisajurczyk on Should you do a PhD? · 2020-07-26T01:55:53.084Z · score: 2 (2 votes) · EA · GW

Great response - thank you!

Comment by marisajurczyk on What skill-building activities have helped your personal and professional development? · 2020-07-25T21:19:21.857Z · score: 7 (3 votes) · EA · GW

I found the Unlocking Your Employability course on EdX had a lot of useful activities for improving self-marketing. Learning How to Learn on Coursera was also helpful, though it doesn't have as many interactive activities. I've also heard good things about this Creative Problem Solving course, but I haven't had the chance to try it myself.

Lynette Bye's Productivity Tips also has a lot of useful resources for improving personal productivity.

I would also add CFAR as probably the most helpful tool I've gotten for improving productivity and decision-making in both personal and professional contexts. :)

Comment by marisajurczyk on Should you do a PhD? · 2020-07-25T20:29:10.570Z · score: 3 (3 votes) · EA · GW

Thanks for this post! I found it quite helpful.

I have a couple of questions about the checklist you linked, though I'm not sure how strongly you endorse it.


Is there a substantial amount of literature in your field?


Was there a major discovery in the field in recent years?

seem to be indicators of neglectedness, which might make the topics more appealing to EAs. Do you think these are better pursued outside of academia? Or not at all?


Do you want a career in academia?

Is there a better option for prospective PhD students who want a career in research outside of academia?

Comment by marisajurczyk on Improving the future by influencing actors' benevolence, intelligence, and power · 2020-07-25T20:23:16.523Z · score: 3 (2 votes) · EA · GW

I found this post really interesting - thank you!

One question I have after reading is the tractability of increasing benevolence, intelligence, and power. I get the sense that increasing benevolence might be the least tractable (though 80,000 Hours seems to think it might still be worth pursuing), though I'm less sure about how intelligence and power compare. (I'm inclined to think intelligence is somewhat more tractable, but I'm highly uncertain about that.)

Comment by marisajurczyk on Should we think more about EA dating? · 2020-07-25T16:24:25.790Z · score: 33 (24 votes) · EA · GW

Believe it or not, you're not the first person to think about this. There's an EA dating site made years ago called, although I'm not sure it gets much use anymore.

Some arguments I've seen in favor of this:

  • Dating another EA might prevent value drift.
  • If a relationship with a non-EA goes sour, that person might have a negative association with EA as a result.
  • Having a partner is generally associated with more happiness, which is perhaps intrinsically good, and perhaps good for helping one feel more motivated to do good in the world.

Some arguments against:

  • The skewed gender ratio in EA might make this difficult. (I'm not sure how this plays out when you take LGBTQ+ people into account.)
  • Dating a non-EA might persuade them to become an EA.

Personally, I feel a bit icky about actively encouraging inter-EA dating, as it feels a bit culty to me, and I think it further insulates us from the rest of the world (which I think is bad, but I think others might disagree with me on). But, at the same time, a lot of different subcultures have their own dating apps and mingling events, and I don't think those are culty, so maybe my concerns aren't well-founded.

Comment by marisajurczyk on How should we run the EA Forum Prize? · 2020-06-23T13:01:52.617Z · score: 12 (8 votes) · EA · GW

I'll offer a data point: I'm not particularly motivated to post on the Forum by a monetary prize. It hasn't led me to post on the Forum more than I ordinarily would. I am somewhat interested in social rewards, but the karma feature seems to do that better than the Forum Prize.

Also, as someone who doesn't read every single post on the Forum, I also find the Prize useful for highlighting what content is actually worth reading, but again, I think highlighting posts based on karma instead (with or without a monetary prize) would work just as well.

If the Forum Prize does continue, I do think there should be separate categories for professional researchers and "amateurs."

Comment by marisajurczyk on Advice for getting the most out of one-on-ones · 2020-06-22T02:15:10.353Z · score: 3 (1 votes) · EA · GW

I've found a couple of other useful resources since first posting this:

Comment by marisajurczyk on Finding an egg cell donor in the EA community · 2020-05-30T19:29:33.958Z · score: 2 (2 votes) · EA · GW

Interesting! Didn't know that.

Comment by marisajurczyk on What are the leading critiques of "longtermism" and related concepts · 2020-05-30T16:20:03.189Z · score: 16 (8 votes) · EA · GW

Not academic or outside of EA, but this Forum comment and this Facebook post may be good starting points if you haven't seen them already.

Comment by marisajurczyk on Finding an egg cell donor in the EA community · 2020-05-30T16:07:59.502Z · score: 4 (4 votes) · EA · GW

I have seen a few EAs discuss selling eggs as a way of earning-to-give. If you're not willing to compensate at market rates, getting a donation may be a bit more difficult, but I don't expect it to be impossible.

If I were to look for an egg cell donor, I would probably make some sort of a post or Google Doc outlining exactly the type of person you're looking for, what you'd expect from them, and what you're willing to compensate. Then sharing it on some EA platforms - I imagine you could generate some leads from Bountied Rationality, LessWrong, some EA Facebook groups (e.g. EA Hangout), maybe local EA groups, and perhaps the Forum.

Comment by marisajurczyk on Developing my inner self vs. doing external actions · 2020-05-30T15:19:57.646Z · score: 0 (2 votes) · EA · GW

I don't have much to add aside from what the other two responses have said except that I think it's possible to have opportunities that both develop the inner self and benefit others. I probably wouldn't endorse spending all your time on these activities, but looking out for them and prioritizing them seems like a good decision to me.

I don't think there's a One Right Answer or a one-size-fits-all approach, but I do think that using the comparative advantage framework may be helpful here.

Comment by marisajurczyk on What are some historical examples of people and organizations who've influenced people to do more good? · 2020-04-25T21:51:57.212Z · score: 1 (1 votes) · EA · GW

You're probably right - mostly wondering if someone had more rigorous evidence on this (or ideas on how to get it) or examples beyond the mainstream ones.

Comment by marisajurczyk on Advice for getting the most out of one-on-ones · 2020-03-21T05:02:13.474Z · score: 15 (8 votes) · EA · GW

First: before you schedule any one-on-ones at EAG (or wherever you are), think about what you want to get out of them/the conference in general. This post includes some sample goals to consider. What your goals are will pretty much dictate what one-on-ones will be most valuable for you.

I'm coming at this as someone whose primary goal for EAGs has generally been to clarify my career plans, and secondary goal has been to make more EA friends, so my advice will likely be skewed towards that.

Who should I meet with?

I usually find myself scheduling three types of one-on-ones

1. People who have a clear connection with my interests or projects (~70%)

2. Peers who share similar personal interests, hobbies, etc. (~20%)

3. People working in areas I don't know much about but would like to learn more about and could plausibly see as changing my mind about a particular cause area / career option / etc. (~10%)

You can also get more people to schedule one-on-ones with you by filling out your conference app profile in full and including a couple things you're interested in talking with people about. Also, if you're using the Grip app, indicate "Interested" on other attendees' profiles. The more you do this, the more meeting requests you'll likely get!

What's the best way to score a meeting with someone I want to talk to? (especially if I don't have any immediately useful skills or knowledge to share)

First, speaking from experience, I find that EAs are more likely than average to hold a meeting with you even if you don't have anything tangible to offer them. When you think about it, by helping you have more of an impact, they're also increasing they're own impact, which is motivating for most EAs. Don't let not having anything to offer immediately keep you from reaching out to someone you think you could have a valuable conversation with!

That said, when you ask someone to meet, it helps if you add a sentence or two about what you'd like to talk about / why you think they'd be useful to talk to. This helps them prepare for the call better and (from anecdotal evidence) makes you more likely to get a response since they know exactly how the call will be useful for you/them.

What if someone I really want to talk to doesn't respond? Should I follow up?

IMO, it depends, and it helps if you can read some non-obvious social cues here (or can get advice from someone who can).

Some things that have worked for me and others:

  • Offering to meet (perhaps virtually) later in the week / the following week, in case the person has a full schedule during the conference weekend
  • Meeting during their office hours (another thing first-timers are sometimes intimidated by but is actually really useful!)

What do I say? What sorts of questions should I ask?

This varies quite a bit based on what you want to know. Whatever that is, you'll want to spend some time thinking about this before.

If you're totally new to one-on-ones, a quick Google search on sample informational interview questions will help get you started.

If you're the type of person who gets anxious about one-on-ones, I find it helpful to run through the conversation in my head mentally ahead of time, jotting down points I want to talk about / questions I want to ask. My conversations don't usually follow the script in actuality, but it soothes my nerves a bit to have something to fall back on in case the conversation lulls.

Also helps to have a few pocket small-talk questions handy, particularly EA-specific ones. Things like "how did you get involved in EA?" and "what cause areas are you most excited about?"

What should I do after the conference? Should I follow up? How often/in what way?

EAG is a bit more informal than most conferences, so I find that the rules are a little more relaxed. It's pretty typical to friend EAs on Facebook after the conference to keep in touch. It's also nice to send a quick thank you email/message after the conference, especially to people more senior than you, and let them know down the line how you've used their advice.

One last thing: If one-on-ones are nerve-wracking for you, you're not alone! As someone who had my first in-person interactions at EAG a year ago, I wasn't sure what to expect meeting with EAs for the first time, but I've found EAs to be incredibly helpful and friendly. And, if for whatever reason, if you find your experience to be anything less than that, CEA has an awesome community health team available to help you out. :)

Comment by marisajurczyk on Utilizing global attention during crises for EA causes · 2020-03-19T22:39:44.866Z · score: 10 (6 votes) · EA · GW

I've been thinking about this also so I'm glad to see this post!

Anecdote: I've been talking to friends and family about COVID-19 since late January/February, and started my first attempts at social distancing towards the beginning of March. In these first few days, a lot of my (non-EA) friends seemed to think this response was an overreaction. Later on, a lot of them came around to say, "wow, you were right," which I've tried to use to point some more credibility towards EA.

Some not-fully-formed ideas I have about this:

  • I think there's an opportunity, once this begins to resolve, to hopefully get some media attention and say something along the lines of "there's a community of people who were thinking about this before it happened, and who are thinking of other possible threats. Here's how you can help."
  • I also think that we might see an influx of young not-currently-EAs interested in helping address future pandemics, but I suspect a lot of them will be drawn to becoming doctors and nurses. So perhaps some publicity for these careers and/or a talent pipeline for biosecurity careers might be useful.
Comment by marisajurczyk on What are some 1:1 meetings you'd like to arrange, and how can people find you? · 2020-03-19T22:13:16.674Z · score: 8 (5 votes) · EA · GW

*updated October 11, 2020*

Who are you?

I'm Marisa :) I graduated with a degree in sociology and business analytics in December 2019, and currently work in operations at Rethink Charity and volunteering with social research at ALLFED. I also run the new EA Anywhere group.

What are some things people can talk to you about? (e.g. your areas of experience/expertise)

  • I talk to a lot of people about EA ops and getting a job at an EA org, but I generally see myself as a starting point for these conversations and will usually try to connect you with someone else who works more closely in the area you're interested in or has more experience.
  • My coursework and experience with nonprofit boards and nonprofit communications
  • Value drift in EA
  • Social science research techniques and applications for the social sciences in EA more broadly
  • I also love talking to other college students / recent grads, particularly those making big career decisions!

What are things you'd like to talk to other people about? (e.g. things you want to learn)

  • I'm excited about improving institutional decision-making, especially designing institutions that are both effective and benevolent. I'd love to talk with people who have similar goals and learn more about how you're thinking about this problem area.
  • I'm curious about careers working directly in US government (executive or legislative branch) and would love to learn more about what it's like and how to gain skills that would be useful for having an impact through government.
  • Also curious to hear other applications for the social sciences in EA that I haven't considered yet.

How can people get in touch with you?

Email me at marisajurczyk[at]gmail[dot]com or schedule a time on Calendly!

Comment by marisajurczyk on What are some software development needs in EA causes? · 2020-03-10T12:36:58.490Z · score: 2 (2 votes) · EA · GW

This might not be exactly what you're looking for, but I'll put it here in case anyone else who reads this might be interested.

Saulius Simcikas wrote an EA Forum post about potential meta-projects, which includes a subsection for software development projects.

Comment by marisajurczyk on Why aren't we talking about personal development? · 2020-03-10T12:23:25.511Z · score: 3 (3 votes) · EA · GW

I agree with this. But I also want to add -- I think a lot of EAs are put off from the rationalist community for different reasons (e.g. seemingly less-than-altruistic motivations, inaccessible language, discussions about things that don't always feel practically relevant, etc.)

From a personal anecdote: I've had an eye on LessWrong and other rationalist spaces for some time, but never thought it was my territory for some of the reasons mentioned above. It wasn't until I went to a CFAR workshop when I finally felt I knew enough about rationality to actually contribute to rationality discussions.

I see a lot of work being done to make EA more accessible to people who don't have personal ties to the EA community, but not as much effort from the rationalist community on this. I feel like this could potentially be impactful for contributing to the personal development of EAs.

Comment by marisajurczyk on A Qualitative Analysis of Value Drift in EA · 2020-02-12T18:07:52.241Z · score: 3 (2 votes) · EA · GW

Thank you! :)

Comment by marisajurczyk on The EA Hotel is now the Centre for Enabling EA Learning & Research (CEEALAR) · 2020-01-29T18:52:35.411Z · score: 4 (3 votes) · EA · GW
I worry that without it it's too similar to CEA though


You could keep the name but drop the first 'A': CEELAR

I also like this.

Comment by marisajurczyk on The EA Hotel is now the Centre for Enabling EA Learning & Research (CEEALAR) · 2020-01-29T17:34:42.113Z · score: 13 (9 votes) · EA · GW

I agree that CEEALAR (I'm pronouncing it see-uh-lar, almost like CLR, in my head) looks a little odd and might be hard to remember the acronym for. But I also agree that to get charitable status, dropping "hotel" was probably a good choice. A lot of nonprofits in the US use "house" (e.g. Covenant House) to give more of a charitable vibe. "EA House" already sounds less for-profit, though maybe less distinctive since EA houses are all over the place. Also, Centre gives me think tank vibes, which may or may not be what you're looking for.

If you're tied to the name, I'd recommend dropping the first E to make it CEALAR (Centre for Effective Altruism Learning And Research) to make it more pronounceable, aesthetic, and brief.

Overall, names are hard, and I'm not sure if it's worth stressing as people will probably keep informally calling it the EA Hotel as is.

Props for putting in the work to keep this organization alive and well. It's a wonderful asset to the EA community. :)

Comment by marisajurczyk on Important EA-related questions EA would like to know from general public · 2019-12-22T00:25:45.000Z · score: 3 (2 votes) · EA · GW

I might be too late, but I was just cleaning through some notes of mine and found some questions related to this from various research agendas that I found interesting:

  • Why do people donate to ineffective charities?
  • Why do people want to donate directly and not too overhead?
  • Why do people care about future people more than current people?
  • How do social norms and expectations influence giving?

Some of these can be incorporated into your current questions (e.g. in the most important qualities when giving, you can mention low overhead). Maybe you can also have people choose or rank who they want to benefit from their giving the most (e.g. their community, animals, future generations, etc.).

Not sure if this is helpful, but glad that you're doing this regardless. :)

Comment by marisajurczyk on Has any EA oriented organization tried promoting donors on their social media? · 2019-10-30T15:06:30.260Z · score: 2 (1 votes) · EA · GW

This is interesting! Have other non-EA organizations been doing this? My main concern would be coming off as self-promoting (for individuals - such is expected for nonprofit orgs). I think EAs are particularly conscious about coming across as people who actually genuinely care about helping the world, rather than people who are just doing good for social status.

I also wonder if there is actually a stigma worth fighting around donating to EA and EA-aligned orgs. In my perspective, it seems that the biggest barriers to EA(-aligned) orgs getting the funding they need is: a) not enough big donors know about, or are sympathetic to EA ideas, or b) orgs themselves aren't giving enough compelling reasons to donate, in the form of quantitative data about cost-effectiveness, impact, and the like.

On the other hand, I could see a scenario where I saw on social media that Person A, who I greatly respect, donates to Organization B, and I might be more compelled to donate to them as a result (though this probably isn't a particularly good way to go about deciding where to donate). I think this is part of why peer-to-peer fundraising is one of the most effective funding techniques. (P2P might be a way to accomplish similar goals to what you mention, while bypassing some of the challenges, though it of course brings up different challenges.)

Comment by marisajurczyk on Remote local group leaders? · 2019-10-14T10:09:35.779Z · score: 9 (5 votes) · EA · GW

Interesting idea! I do see some advantages to this - it seems like there are a lot of people trying to get experience working for EA-related causes, and quite a bit of those people seem interested in gaining ops experience. This seems like a good way to get those people connected with EA, and get people involved who don't currently have local communities.

One worry I have is that people who aren't going to meetups probably don't have a good sense of the culture of the local EA group and how well events are going. This could be worked around by collecting feedback from local group participants, but I think you could get much more information much more easily by being part of the meetups.

An alternative that I think might be useful: A lot of EAs have remote jobs or some flexibility on where they live. As someone with a remote job who currently lives in a community without an active local group and seemingly without people who would be interested in being involved with one, I would be open to moving to a community with lots of EAs but without an active EA group for the sake of helping as a group organizer. Perhaps I'm odd in that way, but perhaps there are a few other EAs that are similar.

In either case, I'd be interested in seeing a list of EA cities that have this problem and coming up with ways to match interested people with open roles. Feel free to reach out to me if you'd like help with this. :)

Comment by marisajurczyk on What book(s) would you want a gifted teenager to come across? · 2019-08-10T04:53:38.593Z · score: 3 (2 votes) · EA · GW

I'm surprised no one has recommended 'Doing Good Better' by MacAskill. I would say that and 'Strangers Downing' as mentioned in a previous comment were most responsible for my engagement with EA. 'Strangers Drowning' I think somewhat primed me to be EA - it made the ideas of EA seem less foreign and odd when I actually came across them. 'Doing Good Better' helped me understand the EA argument quite a bit better and was probably the thing that tipped me from being interested in EA to identifying more or less as an EA.

Comment by marisajurczyk on Want to Save the World? Enter the Priesthood · 2019-07-09T18:06:54.758Z · score: 12 (6 votes) · EA · GW

I definitely agree that religious outreach is a neglected but promising area of EA community-building.

I think a big part of what makes reaching out to religious groups at least somewhat promising is that a lot of them are already trying to do good. If we focus EA outreach on the general population, or most other subpopulations that EA currently focuses outreach on, you'll likely have some people who care about doing good, and others who have different motivations. But in many religious spaces, an obligation to help others is already at the heart of what they do. And it's a lot easier to sell EA to someone who already agrees that we have an obligation to help others as much as possible. Of course, different sects and individual religious communities have varying degrees of commitment to service and doing good, but I would imagine there's some research already available on which groups are most oriented towards doing good (and if not, this is certainly doable research).

Also, from anecdotal experiences from friends and ex-colleagues as well as my own personal experience, I know a lot of agnostic/atheists who are involved in religious groups because they're looking for a community, and often more specifically, they were looking for a community oriented towards thinking deeply about the world's truths and/or doing good in the world. I think EA groups would fulfill this need for a lot of people (and perhaps relieve them from having to pretend to believe something they don't in exchange for social support).